1.6 Compare and contrast network topologies, architectures, and types
📘CompTIA Network+ (N10-009)
A Collapsed Core is a network design architecture used in medium to large networks. It simplifies the traditional three-layer network model by combining layers, which can save cost and make management easier.
1. Understanding the Traditional Three-Layer Network
Before understanding collapsed core, it’s important to know the three-layer network model:
- Core Layer – The backbone of the network. It’s responsible for fast, reliable routing between different parts of the network. Usually very high-speed devices are used here.
- Distribution Layer – Acts as a gateway between the core and access layers, handling routing, filtering, and network policies.
- Access Layer – Where devices like computers, printers, and servers connect to the network.
A standard three-layer network is efficient but can be expensive and complex, especially for medium-sized organizations.
2. What is a Collapsed Core?
A Collapsed Core is when the core layer and the distribution layer are combined into a single layer.
- Instead of having separate devices for core and distribution, a single set of high-performance switches handles both roles.
- This reduces the number of devices and simplifies network design.
3. Key Characteristics of Collapsed Core
- Simplified Design
- Fewer devices in the network.
- Easier to manage and maintain.
- Cost-Effective
- Combines layers, so fewer switches are needed.
- Reduces hardware, power, and cooling costs.
- High Performance
- Collapsed core switches are usually high-capacity, fast switches, capable of handling all traffic efficiently.
- Scalability
- Can grow by adding additional high-performance switches.
- Supports larger networks without adding extra layers.
4. How It Works in a Network
Imagine a medium-sized organization:
- Instead of having a core switch connecting all the distribution switches, and multiple distribution switches connecting access switches, the organization uses two high-end switches that act as both core and distribution.
- Access switches then connect directly to these collapsed core switches.
This creates a network that looks simpler but still allows fast routing and connectivity.
Diagram (simplified):
Access Layer Switches
| | |
-----------------------
| Collapsed Core |
| (Core + Distribution)
-----------------------
- Access switches → end devices (computers, printers, servers)
- Collapsed core → routing and forwarding for all access switches
5. Advantages
- Reduced Complexity – Fewer layers to configure.
- Cost Savings – Less hardware needed.
- High-Speed Backbone – Since the collapsed core handles both routing and distribution, data flows quickly.
- Easier Troubleshooting – Fewer devices mean fewer points of failure.
6. Disadvantages
- Single Point of Failure – If the collapsed core switch fails, a lot of the network could go down.
- Mitigation: Use redundant collapsed core switches.
- Limited Scalability in Very Large Networks – For huge networks, the collapsed core might not handle all the traffic efficiently.
7. Real-Life IT Environment Examples
- Corporate LAN – A medium-size office may use two high-capacity switches in a data center as a collapsed core. Access switches in different departments connect to these switches.
- Data Center Setup – Instead of separate distribution and core layers, a collapsed core switch handles all routing between servers and the access layer.
- Small ISP or Branch Office – They might implement a collapsed core to reduce hardware and simplify management while still having redundancy.
8. Exam Tips
- Know that Collapsed Core = Core + Distribution combined.
- Understand advantages (cost, simplicity) and disadvantages (single point of failure).
- Remember it is common in medium-to-large networks, but not always used in very large enterprise networks where traffic is massive.
- For redundancy, always pair collapsed core switches.
✅ In short:
A collapsed core simplifies a network by combining core and distribution layers into one set of high-performance switches. It reduces cost and complexity but needs redundancy to avoid a single point of failure. It’s popular in medium-to-large IT networks.
